Just Buy CAGE
Should you just buy CAGE?
Avantis' Canadian-listed all-equity factor ETF, for investors who believe factor premia exist. This is a philosophy question before it's a numbers question.
Read this first
CAGE only makes sense as a “just buy” choice if you've already decided you want factor exposure. If you haven't, start with XEQT or VEQT instead. CAGE will likely underperform during growth-led periods, and if you don't have conviction in the factor thesis, you're more likely to switch out at the wrong time. Read about XEQT or VEQT first if you're still deciding.
TL;DR
If you want this, CAGE delivers
- ✓ Academic-grade factor implementation: small-cap, value, profitability tilts
- ✓ Canadian-domiciled: no T1135 foreign reporting hassle
- ✓ Low MER for a factor product (0.32%) from a credible research-driven manager
Worth knowing
- · Higher MER than market-cap alternatives: costs ~$300/yr more per $250K vs XEQT
- · Will trail pure index during growth-led markets: requires conviction to hold through
- · Shorter live track record and smaller AUM than XEQT/VEQT
ETF specifications
CAGE: ETF Specifications
- MER
- ~0.32% (est.)
- Holdings
- ~5,200
- Equity / Bond
- 100% equity
- Distribution
- Quarterly
- Inception
- Feb 2023
- AUM
- ~$270M CAD
- Exchange
- TSX
- Currency
- CAD
Who CAGE is for
CAGE is for investors who believe factor premia exist and will persist. If you want plain cap-weighted market exposure, XEQT or VEQT are simpler choices.
CAGE is for investors who have read the factor research (specifically the Fama-French work on value and size, and subsequent research on profitability) and find it convincing enough to act on. Fama and French documented robust factor premia across markets and time periods going back decades. Avantis, led by former Dimensional Fund Advisors executives, built CAGE specifically to implement these tilts in a single Canadian-listed ETF.
It's important to be clear about what “factor investing” means in practice: factor premia are real in the historical data but not universally accepted as a reliable forward-looking signal. Value stocks underperformed growth stocks for most of the 2010s in the US. Anyone who bought into a factor-tilted strategy during that decade would have trailed a simple index fund for years. If you don't have the conviction to hold through a decade of underperformance, CAGE is not the right choice. XEQT or VEQT will serve you better.
CAGE makes the most sense for investors with a 20+ year investment horizon who have studied the factor thesis, accept the risk of extended underperformance versus the market-cap index, and want a single Canadian-listed ticker rather than building the factor portfolio themselves from individual ETFs.
The convenience trade-off
Just-buying CAGE is a valid option for committed factor investors. Here's what that convenience costs annually and over 20 years compared to the Avantis Factor Split strategy (AVUS + CACE + CADE + AVUV + AVDV + CAEM) with USD components held in an RRSP.
The convenience cost: CAGE vs splitting
Assumes 50% RRSP allocation. See the calculator for your own numbers.
| Portfolio | Annual cost | 20-year cost (compounded) |
|---|---|---|
| $250K | $369/yr | $13,579 |
| $500K | $738/yr | $27,158 |
| $1M | $1,477/yr | $54,316 |
Annual cost combines MER drag and foreign withholding tax savings foregone. Assumes 50% RRSP / 50% TFSA split. 20-year figure compounds annual savings at 6% growth.
Common alternatives
Frequently asked questions
What is factor investing?+
Why is Avantis credible?+
When would CAGE underperform XEQT?+
Is CAGE worth the higher MER?+
Can I split CAGE further?+
See exactly what splitting CAGE would save for your portfolio size and account mix.
Open the ETF Split Calculator →